Review U.S. laws (federal laws, not state laws) that relate to public health.
Review U.S. laws (federal laws, not state laws) that relate to public health.
Which public health laws surprised you, and why so?
Which laws did not surprise you?
Review current U.S. laws that relate to public health.
This paper is not bad but I had to make a lot of English corrections
Here is an idea
Public health system is often considered as including federal general public health and fitness organizations, although now is comprehended to incorporate the two different public-sector organizations such as colleges, Medicaid and the environmental security organizations, land-use agencies, and private-sector organizations whose actions have major penalties for the health of people. The training of public health might be looked at when it comes to the key processes in which professionals look for to spot, tackle, along with prioritize group or maybe population-wide medical problems along with assets as well as the results of these much more simple processes, public health’s interventions, plans, regulations, and services. The processes of public wellness are usually those that recognize along with handle medical problems as well as the plans along with services according to requires along with group focal points. Biomedicine is the effective use of the actual guidelines on the normal sciences, specifically biology in addition to physiology, to scientific medication.
Public health laws are laws and regulations which have important implications for the sake of the outlined populations. The public health law on drugs, alcohol and tobacco is most surprising. People have been given the liberty to consume products of alcohol and tobacco which harmful effects to those that directly consume them and also to the people who around the persons who consume the products. Like in the case of alcohol, a person will consume it then go ahead and drive under the influence risking their lives and the life of other drivers and pedestrians. With tobacco, the smoking of it increases the chances of the consumer getting laugh cancer. The consumption of these products is regulated by the government because they earn it a lot of revenue but what I think should be done is a total burn of the consumption as they create more harm than good.
Public health system is often considered as including federal general public health and fitness organizations, although now is comprehended to incorporate the two different public-sector organizations such as colleges, Medicaid and the environmental security organizations, land-use agencies, and private-sector organizations whose actions have major penalties for the health of people. The training of public health might be looked at when it comes to the key processes in which professionals look for to spot, tackle, along with prioritize group or maybe population-wide medical problems along with assets as well as the results of these much more simple processes, public health’s interventions, plans, regulations, and services. The processes of public wellness are usually those that recognize along with handle medical problems as well as the plans along with services according to requires along with group focal points. Biomedicine is the effective use of the actual guidelines on the normal sciences, specifically biology in addition to physiology, to scientific medication.
Public health laws are laws and regulations which have important implications for the sake of the outlined populations. The public health law on drugs, alcohol and tobacco is most surprising. People have been given the liberty to consume products of alcohol and tobacco which harmful effects to those that directly consume them and also to the people who around the persons who consume the products. Like in the case of alcohol, a person will consume it then go ahead and drive under the influence risking their lives and the life of other drivers and pedestrians. With tobacco, the smoking of it increases the chances of the consumer getting laugh cancer. The consumption of these products is regulated by the government because they earn it a lot of revenue but what I think should be done is a total burn of the consumption as they create more harm than good.
Work cited
“What Is the Public Health System? | HHS.gov.” United States Department of Health and Human Services | HHS.gov. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Oct. 2013. <https://ift.tt/2vbNVxm>.
“Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco.” Public Health Law Research. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
Public health law is an emerging field in U.S. public health practice. The 20th century proved the indispensability of law to public health, as demonstrated by the contribution of law to each of the century’s 10 great public health achievements (Table 1) (2,3). Former CDC Director Dr. William Foege has suggested that law, along with epidemiology, is an essential tool in public health practice (4).
“What Is the Public Health System? | HHS.gov.” United States Department of Health and Human Services | HHS.gov. N.p., n.d. Web. 9 Oct. 2013. <https://ift.tt/2vbNVxm>.
“Drugs, Alcohol and Tobacco.” Public Health Law Research. N.p., n.d. Web. 10 Oct. 2013.
Public health law is an emerging field in U.S. public health practice. The 20th century proved the indispensability of law to public health, as demonstrated by the contribution of law to each of the century’s 10 great public health achievements (Table 1) (2,3). Former CDC Director Dr. William Foege has suggested that law, along with epidemiology, is an essential tool in public health practice (4).
Public health laws are any laws that have important consequences for the health of defined populations. They derive from federal and state constitutions; statutes, and other legislative enactments; agency rules and regulations; judicial rulings and case law; and policies of public bodies. Government agencies that apply public health laws include agencies officially designated as “public health agencies,” as well as health-care, environmental protection, education, and law enforcement agencies, among others.
Scope of Public Health Law
Law is foundational to U.S. public health practice. Laws establish and delineate the missions of public health agencies, authorize and delimit public health functions, and appropriate essential funds. The concept of public health law gained momentum early in the 20th century in James Tobey’s seminal volumes (1). Frank Grad’s practical guide, The Public Health Law Manual (5), and Lawrence Gostin’s treatment of public health law under the U.S. constitutional design followed (6). A CDC-related contribution to this literature emphasized the interdisciplinary relation between law and public health practice (7).
The concept of public health law has evolved into overlapping paradigms. One paradigm frames public health practice in relation to multiple sources of law (e.g., statutes and regulations) and to fields of law (e.g., constitutional and environmental law). The other, a more scholarly view, focuses on the legal powers and duties of government to ensure public health and limitations on government powers to constrain the protected liberties of individuals.
Integration of Public Health Law Within CDC and State Public Health Practice
Public health law at CDC and at many of its partner organizations has earned explicit recognition only recently. During CDC-sponsored workshops on public health law in 1999–2000, major public health stakeholders, including health officers, epidemiologists, public health lawyers, educators, and legislators, called for strengthening the legal foundation for public health practice. These stakeholders concluded that public health would benefit by adding legal skills and scientific knowledge about the impact of law on public health to the toolkits of public health practitioners. CDC consequently established its Public Health Law Program (PHLP) in 2000 with a mission for improving the public’s health through law (8).
Primary goals of PHLP are to enhance the public health system’s legal preparedness to address emerging threats, chronic diseases, and other national public health priorities and to improve use of law to support program activities. PHLP focuses on these goals by 1) strengthening the competencies of public health professionals, attorneys, and other practitioners to apply law to public health; 2) stimulating applied research about the effectiveness of laws in public health; 3) fostering partnerships among organizations and professionals working in public health and law; and 4) developing and disseminating authoritative information about public health law to public health practice, policy, and other communities (8). PHLP does not provide legal advice to CDC programs; that remains the separate responsibility of the Office of the General Counsel of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
State and local partners also are strengthening public health legal preparedness. CDC has stimulated this in part through initiatives such as “Public Health Emergency Law,” a course delivered nationally in state and local health departments (8). In some states, grassroots activities are increasing competencies of practitioners to use law and strengthening legal preparedness capacities of public health systems. For example, in California, the Public Health Law Work Group (comprising representatives of county counsel and city attorney offices) drafted a legally annotated health officer practice guide for communicable disease control (9). Related activities in California include a 2006 conference on legal preparedness for pandemic influenza, and a series of forensic epidemiology joint training programs for public health and law enforcement agencies.
Role of Public Health Law in Addressing High Priorities in Public Health
The indispensable role of law is evident across the entire history of U.S. public health—from early colonialists’ needs to defend against infectious threats to today’s innovative law-based approaches to preventing chronic diseases, injuries, and other problems (Table 2). The U.S. experience with smallpox illustrates how, at some points in history, law-based interventions were implemented even before science elucidated the nature of the public health threat and the basis of the intervention. The legal-epidemiologic strategy of quarantine to prevent the spread of smallpox was employed on Long Island as early as 1662 (10). Smallpox prevention also was at the root of the 1905 landmark decision in Jacobson v. Massachusetts in which the U.S. Supreme Court upheld the Massachusetts statutory requirement for smallpox vaccination (11).
Public health is examining law-based countermeasures to the use of smallpox virus and other infectious pathogens as biologic weapons. In its program of grants supporting states’ development of capacity to address public health emergencies, CDC expects states to attain legal preparedness for such emergencies in the wake of the 2001 anthrax attacks, the severe acute respiratory syndrome epidemic in 2003, the 2005 hurricane disasters, and the specter of an A(H5N1) influenza pandemic. Response to these threats has spawned new and innovative resources, such as the draft Model State Emergency Health Powers Act, the CDC forensic epidemiology course for joint training of public health and law enforcement officials, community public health legal preparedness workshops for hospital and public health attorneys, public health law “bench books” for the judiciary, and the CDC Public Health Emergency Legal Preparedness Clearinghouse (8).
The post appeared first on Capital Essay Writing Blog.
CLICK HERE TO ORDER THIS PAPER………………………NO PLAGIARISM Get 100% Original papers from the writing experts
CLICK HERE TO GET A PROFESSIONAL WRITER TO WORK ON THIS PAPER AND OTHER SIMILAR PAPERS, GET A NON PLAGIARIZED PAPER FROM OUR EXPERTS
Comments
Post a Comment